RAS BiologyБиоорганическая химия Russian Journal of Bioorganic Chemistry

  • ISSN (Print) 0132-3423
  • ISSN (Online) 1998-2860

Synthesis and Study of Cytotoxicity of 3β-Acetoxyurs-12-en-28-oyl-thiourea Derivatives

PII
S19982860S0132342325030053-1
DOI
10.7868/S1998286025030053
Publication type
Article
Status
Published
Authors
Volume/ Edition
Volume 51 / Issue number 3
Pages
418-431
Abstract
The interaction of 3β-acetoxyurs-12-en-28-oyl chloride with potassium rhodanide afforded 3β-acetoxyurs12-en-28-oyl isothiocyanate. A series of substituted 3β-acetoxy-urs-12-en-28-oyl-thioureas was synthesised in yields of 69-88% by condensation of triterpene acyl isothiocyanate with a series of amino derivatives. The CuAAC cycloaddition reaction of N-(2-azidoethylcarbamothioyl)-3-acetoxyurs-12-en-28-oyl-amide with propargyl alcohol and 3-(prop-2-inyloxy)-4,5-((R,S)-methoxymethylenedioxy)-benzoate led to the formation of hybrid acylthioureas containing a 1,2,3-triazole linker in 72 and 75% yields. In CuAAC reactions of N-(prop-2-ynylcarbamothioyl)-3β-acetoxyurs-12-en-28-oylamide with substituted acylthiourea azides containing 1,2,3-triazole were isolated in moderate yields of 48-62%. The use of one-pot-reactor version of the synthesis with the preparation of substituted (1H-1,2,3-triazol-4-yl)methanamines in the reaction of propargylamine with substituted azides followed by condensation with 3β-acetoxyurs-12en-28-oyl isothiocyanate increased the yield of 1,2,3-triazole-containing acylthioureas to 65-85%. Polar triterpene acylthioureas containing carboxyl or alcohol groups exhibited high inhibitory activity against HepG2 cells, significantly superior to the parent compound ursolic acid, and were also more selective than the drug doxorubicin. Among the acylthioureas, products of CuAAC cycloaddition, the most active was the polar derivative with (1H-1,2,3-triazol-4-yl)methanol substituent, which was cytotoxic to all cells tested, including the non-tumour control, but superior in selectivity to doxorubicin. Ursane hybrids with acylthiourea derivatives are of interest for further investigation as promising antitumour agents.
Keywords
тритерпеноид урсоловая кислота ацилтиомочевина CuAAC-циклоприсоединение цитотоксичность
Date of publication
07.12.2025
Year of publication
2025
Number of purchasers
0
Views
5

References

  1. 1. Xing Y.L., Bi L.W., Zhao Z.D., Xia T.J. // Adv. Mater. Res. 2013. V. 781. P. 787-791. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.781-784.787
  2. 2. Jäger S., Trojan H., Kopp T., Laszczyk M.N., Scheffler A. // Molecules. 2009. V. 14. P. 2016-2031. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules14062016
  3. 3. López-Hortas L., Pérez-Larrán P., González-Muñoz M.J., Falqué E., Domínguez H. // Food Res. Int. 2018. V. 103. P. 130-149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodres.2017.10.028
  4. 4. Pironi A.M., de Araújo P.R., Fernandes M.A., Salgado H.R.N., Chorilli M. // Crit. Rev. Anal. Chem. 2018. V. 48. P. 86-93. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408347.2017.1390425
  5. 5. Nistor G., Trandafirescu C., Prodea A., Milan A., Cristea A., Ghiulai R., Racoviceanu R., Mioc A., Mioc M., Ivan V. // Molecules. 2022. V. 27. P. 6552. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27196552
  6. 6. Wei Z.-Y., Chi K.-Q., Wang K.-S., Wu J., Liu L.-P., Piao H.-R. // Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2018. V. 28. P. 1797-1803. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bmcl.2018.04.021
  7. 7. Wang W., Lei L., Liu Z., Wang H., Meng Q. // Molecules. 2019. V. 24. P. 877. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24050877
  8. 8. Viji V., Helen A., Luxmi V.R. // Br. J. Pharmacol. 2011. V. 162. P. 1291-1303. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1476-5381.2010.01112.x
  9. 9. Luan T., Jin C., Jin C.-M., Gong G.-H., Quan Z.-S. // J. Enzyme Inhib. Med. Chem. 2019. V. 34. P. 761-772. https://doi.org/10.1080/14756366.2019.1584622
  10. 10. Larik F.A., Shah M.S., Saeed A., Shah H.S., Channar P.A., Bolte M., Iqbal J. // Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018. V. 116. P. 144-150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.05.001
  11. 11. Aly A.A., Ahmed E.K., El-Mokadem K.M., Hegazy M.E.A.F. // J. Sulfur Chem. 2007. V. 28. P. 73-93. https://doi.org/10.1080/17415990601124691
  12. 12. Saeed A., Flörke U., Erben M.F. // J. Sulfur Chem. 2014. V. 35. P. 318-355. https://doi.org/10.1080/17415993.2013.834904
  13. 13. Saeed A., Erben M.F., Bolte M. // Spectrochim. Acta Part A Mol. Biomol. Spectrosc. 2013. V. 102. P. 408- 413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.saa.2012.10.043
  14. 14. Mahmood A., Shah S.J.A., Iqbal J. // Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2022. V. 231. P. 114162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmech.2022.114162
  15. 15. Asegbeloyin J.N., Oyeka E.E., Okpareke O., Ibezim A. // J. Mol. Struct. 2018. V. 1153. P. 69-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molstruc.2017.09.093
  16. 16. Li Z., Zhang Y., Wang Y. // Phosphorus, Sulfur Silicon Relat. Elem. 2003. V. 178. P. 293-297. https://doi.org/10.1080/10426500307952
  17. 17. del Campo R., Criado J.J., Gheorghe R., González F.J., Hermosa M.R., Sanz F., Manzano J.L., Monte E., Rodrıguez-Fernández E. // J. Inorg. Biochem. 2004. V. 98. P. 1307-1314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2004.03.019
  18. 18. Huang X., Huang R., Liao Z., Pan Y., Gou S., Wang H. // Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2016. V. 108. P. 381- 391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmech.2015.12.008
  19. 19. Huang X.-C., Wang M., Pan Y.-M., Yao G.-Y., Wang H.-S., Tian X.-Y., Qin J.-K., Zhang Y. // Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2013. V. 69. P. 508-520. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmech.2013.08.055
  20. 20. Liu J., Lu Y., Wang J., Bi L., Zhao Z. // Chinese J. Org. Chem. 2017. V. 37. P. 731-738. https://doi.org/10.6023/cjoc201610017
  21. 21. Baltina L.A., Davydova V.A., Tolstikova T.G., Zarudii F.A., Kondratenko R.M., Tolstikov G.A. // Pharm. Chem. J. 1991. V. 25. P. 705-710.
  22. 22. Popov S., Qi Z., Wang C., Shults E. // J. Sulfur Chem. 2023. P. 523-541. https://doi.org/10.1080/17415993.2023.2193669
  23. 23. Popov S.A., Semenova M.D., Baev D.S., Frolova T.S., Shestopalov M.A., Wang C., Qi Z., Shults E.E., Turks M. // Steroids. 2020. V. 162. P. 108698. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.steroids.2020.108698
  24. 24. Sang S., Lapsley K., Rosen R.T., Ho C.-T. // J. Agric. Food Chem. 2002. V. 50. P. 607-609. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf0110194
  25. 25. Tkachev A.V., Denisov A.Y. // Tetrahedron. 1994. V. 50. P. 2591-2598. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-4020 (01)86975-1
  26. 26. Qi Z., Xie P., Wang Z., Zhou H., Tao R., Popov S.A., Yang G., Shults E.E., Wang C. // Arab. J. Chem. 2024. V. 17. P. 105762. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arabjc.2024.105762
QR
Translate

Индексирование

Scopus

Scopus

Scopus

Crossref

Scopus

Higher Attestation Commission

At the Ministry of Education and Science of the Russian Federation

Scopus

Scientific Electronic Library